|
by Gerald Udowiczenko
Well due to not much space because of a full postbag and not much to
say I'll be keeping this short.
No real surprises in the first round of the draft, other than the number
of 3* players still left and that the Dolphins really wanted a punter,
but unfortunately so did the Saints and Lions.
As always many thanks to Apple, Jon, Graham, Brucey & Tim for their
contributions. Cheers guys without you the newsletter just won't happen.

Wild Cards Games
NJ (11-6, W4) @ CL (12-4, W1) Last time : wk 13, 2004 (10 - 42)
Gerald : The jets are on a good roll at present,
but will that extra game give the Browns the edge they need? Don't think
so. Jets by 3.
Graham : After the display their offence put
up last week it is dangerous to bet against the Jets, but one wonders
how much time that offence will get to spend on the field given the Browns
ball-control ability. CL 7.
Jon : The jets have put on a late surge to
come into the playoffs as a form team. This, however, should be a game
too far for them, even though the Browns' form hasn't been quite what
their coach wanted. CL x 3
SPLATT : Cleveland by 1.
DB (12-4, W1) @ BB (14-2, W4) Last time : wk 15, 2004 (20 - 35)
Gerald : Can't really see the Bills losing
yet. But it will be a lot closer than their last meeting. Bills by 6.
Graham : Richard's AB playoff record is pretty
breathtaking so you have to back him, even against another past champion
in the form of Dave's Broncos. Denver haven't actually garnered much attention
this year, having strolled to the title of a very, very weak division.
BB 6.
Jon : Another traditional post season game.
Expect some serious offence here. The Bills have the edge though as, with
all due respect, the AFC West hasn't been as much of a challenge as the
East. BB x 4.
SPLATT : Buffalo by 5.
WR (13-4, W1) @ MV (16-0, W18) Last time : wk 3, 2004 (7 - 23)
Gerald : The Skins have finally broken that
Jinx, but to advance they have one difficult opponent to beat. Which I
feel will be one too many obstacle. Vikes by 3.
Graham : The pressure is off Paul - he's got
that first playoff win and he'll be the underdog here against the all-conquering
Vikings. If both his offensive and defensive units are in top form he
may have a shot, but there aren't too many chinks in Minnesota's armour
and unless they get complacent they ought to have that bit too much. MV
10.
Jon : Well, Paul's finally broken his duck.
So now it's time to carry on the good work and show what his D is made
of. The Vikes have been near unstoppable this season, but history is there
to repeat itself and last season the 16-0 Rams lost at this stage. So
an upset is on the cards. WR x 1.
SPLATT : Washington by 5.
SR (11-5, W2) @ PE (12-4, W1) Last time : wk 13, 2004 (12 - 28)
Gerald : The old boys meet yet again and what
a game it should be. The Rams have started on the slippery slope of losing
as many games as Superbowl appearances and will not only want to avenge
the regular season loss, but last seasons Divisional Game. But I think
the Eagles will be too strong. Eagles by 10.
Graham : Seemingly an AB annual event. This
year's instalment takes place in Philly, where I've enjoyed two of my
most spectacular AB playoff victories but have generally had a rotten
time during the regular season. We desperately need to summon up one of
our better performances, because the other kind has become an increasingly
common sight this season and will spell certain doom if it rears its ugly
head again.
Jon : 2 veteran QBs in their traditional post-season
meeting. Graham has a far superior record in playoffs, but I hope this
is farewell to Miller all the same.
SPLATT : Philadelphia by 3.
Silver Bowl
SF (10-7, L2) @ MD (10-7, L1)
Gerald : The Fish look the stronger team and
are at home. So Fish by 6.
NS (7-10, W5) @ PS (11-6, W1)
Gerald : Saints keep up their winning streak,
but only just (as the Steelers look at the Con Bowl in the same vain as
Man U do with the Worthington Cup). Saints by 3.
NE (6-11, W1) @ CB (7-10, W1)
Gerald : No comment.
SS (4-13, W1) @ DL (5-11-1, W2)
Gerald : Lions D dominates, as normal. But
for a change their offensive also turn up. Lions by 10.
Bronze Bowl
AC (0-16, L28) @ TT (3-13, L5)
Gerald : The Cards will want to end this losing
streak as soon as possible. But I fear that it will probably get well
into the 30's before they are able to do so. But saying that, I still
think the Titans will struggle. But still should come out on top. Titans
by 1.
OR (3-14, L11) @ DC (4-13, L1)
Gerald : The Raiders are another team that
want to break their current streak. But they will find it touch against
a Cowboys team who want to achieve great things and will be bitterly disappointed
with last weeks display. Boyz wake up and win by 2.
KC (5-11-1, L1) @ TB (6-11, L2)
Gerald : Tough one to call, as the Chiefs do
have a great offence, at times. But I don't think this week will be one
of those times . Buccs by 3.
CI (8-9, L1) @ AF (9-7, L3)
Gerald : Paul (Gregory) will have been bitterly
disappointed to have lost last week, especially as the Benglas came into
the game with a great winning streak. But lost they did and I think they
will do so again, as the Falcon are one of the teams very unlucky not
to have got to the play-offs. Falcons by 10.
by Graham Canwell (Week 17) |
|

 |
PLAYOFFS |

 |
| Offence |
New York |
Most of the points might have come in the final
quarter was this was an almost flawless performance throughout, especially
from QB Chad Pennington (who I note is a mere 2 year vet - maybe there's
hope for me next year after all . . .) |
 |
| Defence |
Washington |
Paul finally broke his playoff duck, and did it
with his trademark Redskins football - a solid running game and that
renowned stingy defence. |
 |
| Coach |
Purrington (NJ) |
For the second week running came up with a stunning
display in the face of potential elimination. An easy award to give,
although for slaying a personal demon Paul definitely deserves an
honourable mention. |
 |
| |

 |
CON
BOWL |

 |
| Offence |
Pittsburgh |
Took out some of their frustration at missing
the playoffs on the unfortunate Falcons. The engagingly erratic Pats
were the best of the rest. |
 |
| Defence |
Detroit |
A unit famous for its perpetual heroic struggle
to overcome that oh-so-dodgy Lions offence. There was no way the offence
was going to sabotage this week's defensive effort, which limited
the Cowboys to just 147 offensive yards. |
 |
| Coach |
Dilworth (NS) |
Has the Saints playing fantastically well right
now. Maybe they'll wear themselves out before next season gets under
way (he sighed longingly). |
 |
| |
| |
The Diddley |
Chicago |
I've never seen Paul need to turn to Diddleying
to get wins in AC but he clearly demonstrated this week that he can
turn his hand to it if the need does arise, as the Buccs demonstrated
the fine art of getting minimo points for maximo yardage. |
 |
|

Gerald to Brucey : Sorry due I wasn't able
to put your stuff in this week. But I will be there next week.
Gerald to Paul S. : At last. Now can you
go all the way?
Gerald to Tim : You sure were :o)
Gerald to All Pauls : There are too many
of you, please chose different names. Well at least 3 of you.
Gerald to Terry : First time I've ever seen
3 team go for a punter in the first round. You must be gutted about only
getting a 2* player?
Gerald to Paul Mac : So will I use any Play
Action Passes? By the time you read this (assuming you read the Gameplan
first?) you'll know?
Gerald to Apple : Come in No.6.
Graham to Jon : What can I say. Let's roll.
Graham to Paul S : Congratulations on breaking
that playoff duck. Well deserved and long overdue.
Jon to Graham : I hope this is Miller's final
game!
Jon to Paul S : Congratulations. About time.
Now all you have to do is beat the 16-0 Vikes as a W/C team. You've got
a chance - I did it to Graham last season in the same circumstances.
Jon to All : Nice though it is to have the
No.1 D, it won't count for anything if it doesn't perform in the playoffs.
Jon to the New coaches : Welcome one and
all. Next season's going to be a killer!
Jon to Stuart : I see your poor general playoff
form continued. Don't take it too hard. You're a coach that people worry
about. And look at Paul Spence. Now 1-9 in playoff games (I think). (My
records show 1-7? Ed.)
Jon to All : Regarding the (real-life) Superbowl,
I was struck by the stats. I'm pretty convinced that if we'd seen them
on the round-up, Graham would have awarded the Pats a Diddley. If I'd
been reading it play by play I would have felt robbed. Yet it didn't actually
seem that way whilst watching the game.....
Tim to Gerald : Yeah I was really lucky when
I beat you.
Tim to Graham : Thanks for the congrats -
I hope I don't get to play you in the playoffs, I cannot se me beating
you twice in a season.
Tim to Troy : I think you may be worth a
small bet for the Silver Bowl title.
| Coaching Profile |
|
Name
|
Richard
Appleby (though prefers to be called Apple). |
 |
| Occupation |
Postie |
| Age |
37 |
| Location |
Daventry |
|
| Gameplan Experience |
8 years, 15 SB appearances, 10 wins. |
| Favourite Team |
Arizona Cardinals (20 years of pain). |
| Interests |
Cricket (Bears), Most sports. Played and reached county Level (Warwicks)
at Darts
|
| Favourite TV |
The Prisoner- Patrick McGoohan.
|
| Favourite Music |
The Kinks. |
| Cowboys Choke |
| by Apple |
|
After my first game in charge and utter hammering at the hands
of the Lions (of all teams) I think I have some work to do! 20 points
of strengths have been retired or waived after the first draft round,
major changes have taken place in all departments, I'm going with
a 5* QB 2yrs this year and hope to get near a .500% split.
The FA market is not to my liking as I only intend to buy 2 people
that will suit my gameplan, I will be moving to a 3-4 Def &
having a full compliment of WR's & RB's (I hope) to maximise
the Offence potential of this team, the other 150 LP's left over,
I will use to train some of the more experienced guys in basic skills
which is sadly lacking in all areas. The training schedule I use
will take a season to implement (for the carry over) I was hoping
for some help in this section, unfortunately the training I do have
in most cases is not even enough to get 1 carry over, this has been
a big headache in trying to "save" some plays for next
season and not start from scratch.
Overall the team could be in good shape if we draft and bid successfully
but a winning season is not expected until the season after. This
is a big rebuilding job as I believe they have not had a coach for
a while.
|
| The Making of the 2004 Vikings |
| by Tim Whitfield |
|
I took over the Vikings after week 4 of the 2000 season. They were
0-4 and one of the worst teams in the league. The roster had a lot
of places filled by one star players and the defence was weak. The
receiving corps was experienced but reaching retirement and devoid
of return strengths. The most positive aspect was the running back
position with two excellent young prospects, a 4* rookie and a 3*
second year player.
I ended the season 6-9-1 which meant I had a winning season and
drafted 9th. I concentrated on defence picking up a couple of DBs
and a LB. The next season I started 1-5 and thought that I was never
going to make it. But after I coached my DB to make him 4* I went
on a five game winning streak and ended up as divisional champs.
The next season I did some more surgery to make the roster stronger
at individual positions. I also upped my return capacity. 2002 was
my break out season winning the Central 13-3, beating the Rams in
regular season only to lose to them in the playoffs.
|
There is no good explanation for why the Vikings performed so poorly
in 2003. But it did set me up for the next season. In the off-season
I was able to pick up a free agent 5* QB. I raised the 50 LP by
sacrificing my kicker (replacing him in the draft) and by giving
up two step losses. I had squad strengths 1.5 below the league average!
It was worth it. My new QB went from 17 INTs to a league record
6 in 2004. The offence took off with the running backs now reaching
maturity the running game set up the passing game and forced oppositions
into change up mode. I got my revenge on the Rams. I played the
big games great but tended to struggle against the lower teams -
the Lions and Bears running me particularly close.
I don't know if I can make it through the playoffs but I think
that I've established the Vikes as a major force for several years
to come.
|
| Turnovers (by net
Giveaways/Takeaways) NFLAB Season 2004 - upto Week 16 |
 |
Giveaways |
Takeaways |
Net |
| Team |
Fumbles |
Ints |
Total |
Rank |
Fumbles |
Ints |
Total |
Rank |
Total |
Rank |
| Denver |
9 |
18 |
27 |
4= |
17 |
25 |
42 |
4 |
15 |
3 |
| Buffalo |
14 |
14 |
28 |
8= |
13 |
28 |
41 |
5= |
13 |
4= |
| Cleveland |
19 |
16 |
35 |
16 |
19 |
27 |
46 |
1= |
11 |
7 |
| Pittsburgh |
19 |
18 |
37 |
17 |
21 |
24 |
45 |
3 |
8 |
8= |
| Miami |
13 |
19 |
32 |
11= |
17 |
23 |
40 |
7= |
8 |
8= |
| New England |
12 |
15 |
27 |
4= |
18 |
9 |
27 |
15= |
0 |
10= |
| Kansas City |
12 |
18 |
30 |
10 |
10 |
20 |
30 |
14 |
0 |
10= |
| Cincinnati |
13 |
19 |
32 |
11= |
14 |
17 |
31 |
12= |
-1 |
12= |
| Seattle |
14 |
20 |
34 |
14= |
15 |
18 |
33 |
10 |
-1 |
12= |
| New York |
18 |
21 |
39 |
19= |
4 |
21 |
25 |
19= |
-14 |
20= |
| Oakland |
19 |
29 |
48 |
23 |
15 |
16 |
31 |
12= |
-17 |
22 |
| Tennessee |
19 |
31 |
50 |
24 |
12 |
11 |
23 |
23 |
-27 |
24 |
 |
Giveaways |
Takeaways |
Net |
| Team |
Fumbles |
Ints |
Total |
Rank |
Fumbles |
Ints |
Total |
Rank |
Total |
Rank |
| St Louis |
7 |
6 |
13 |
1 |
21 |
25 |
46 |
1= |
33 |
1 |
| Minnesota |
10 |
6 |
16 |
2 |
10 |
31 |
41 |
5= |
25 |
2 |
| Washington |
16 |
9 |
25 |
3 |
20 |
18 |
38 |
9 |
13 |
4= |
| Philadelphia |
14 |
14 |
28 |
8= |
24 |
16 |
40 |
7= |
12 |
6 |
| San Francisco |
9 |
18 |
27 |
4= |
12 |
14 |
26 |
18 |
-1 |
12= |
| Dallas |
12 |
15 |
27 |
4= |
13 |
12 |
25 |
19= |
-2 |
15 |
| Tampa Bay |
17 |
21 |
38 |
18 |
20 |
12 |
32 |
11 |
-6 |
16 |
| Arizona |
10 |
24 |
34 |
14= |
12 |
15 |
27 |
15= |
-7 |
17 |
| Atlanta |
19 |
14 |
33 |
13 |
9 |
12 |
21 |
24 |
-12 |
18 |
| Chicago |
17 |
23 |
40 |
21 |
11 |
16 |
27 |
15= |
-13 |
19 |
| Detroit |
16 |
23 |
39 |
19= |
13 |
12 |
25 |
19= |
-14 |
20= |
| New Orleans |
23 |
24 |
47 |
22 |
11 |
13 |
24 |
22 |
-23 |
23 |
| End of Season Awards |
|
Remember you can't vote for yourself, except in the last two categories.
Last season winners are in brackets.
|
| |
Best Offence (Rams)
Best Defence (Redskins)
Best Team (Redskins)
Best Coach (Canwell - SR)
Best Rookie Coach (Horne - CL)
Most Improved Team (Browns)
Most disappointing team (Jets)
Most Hated Coach (Graham Canwell)
|
|
| Someone has asked for an additional category
to be considered for inclusion in the End of Season Awards and I'm
more than happy to oblige, especially as they have included a vote.
The new Award is |
| |
Worst Team
(and you can vote yourself if you want) |
|

Well that about it for this week, with a little luck I could get a good
run in the Con Bowl? While it doesn't really mean that much (but reading
a gameplan were you win is always nice), it does give me that extra training
opportunity and if I go all the way, the chance of showing what I could
have done If Only...
|